MEMBER PORTAL
CAREERS
CONTACT US

Type To Search

Type To Search

Blog: The Latest

Did We CONNECT Our Future? Transportation Part 2: Looking Ahead at Opportunities and Challenges

July 9, 2021

Opportunities and Challenges for Implementing a Shared Regional Transportation Vision

Part IV in the CONNECT Our Future Retrospective Series

Centralina Regional Council started an initiative in February 2021 to inventory and evaluate accomplishments in the region that tie back to CONNECT Our Future and highlight specific data and stories that may inform new actions or priorities for Centralina staff as they continue to support local initiatives that implement the region’s priorities. Articles in The Central Lines newsletter are being shared with the region that summarize information collected to evaluate general topics for three focus areas: land use, transportation and community health. Some of the information collected demonstrates a direct connection to the regional effort, while other information determines if the actions of local governments, advocacy groups, private businesses or others combined to positively influence one or more broad goals from CONNECT Our Future.

Several priorities for the CONNECT Our Future initiative relate to transportation, namely increasing transportation choices (modes), reducing commute costs (transportation technologies and land use) and improving air quality (emissions). Two articles published focus on transportation mobility, accessibility, policy and partnerships in the region. Specifically, are attitudes toward travel behavior changing and how are state, regional and local transportation organizations working together to meet future transportation system needs? Conditions were evaluated based on locally adopted plans and studies and empirical data collected from secondary sources. Part one of the transportation assessment looked back at metrics and changing conditions for the period between 2010 and 2019. This article (Part two) looks forward to opportunities and challenges facing the region now or in the future as communities come together with increasing interests to implement a shared vision for the regional transportation system.

The summary of shared visions for the regional transportation system and national examples for successful implementation in this article is organized under three general topics:

1. Shared Visions for the Regional Transportation System
  • Coordinate Investments for the Regional Transportation System
    • Greater Charlotte Regional Freight Mobility Study
    • Metrolina CommunityViz Initiative
    • CONNECT Beyond: A Regional Mobility Initiative
    • Greater Charlotte Region Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Plan
    • Beyond 77 Strategic Plan
    • Catawba Crossings
  • Greater Land Use – Transportation Coordination
  • Transportation Demand Management
  • Funding & Partnership Groups
2. National Examples and Best Practices
  • Livable Centers Initiative, Atlanta Regional Commission
  • Transportation-Land Use Connections Program, Metropolitan Washington COG
  • Transportation Demand Management Program, Arlington County, VA
  • Nashville Connecton Transportation Demand Management Program, TN
3. Key Takeaways for Coordinating the Region’s Transportation Future
  • Coordinating Investments in the Region
  • Coordinating Transportation and Land Use Decisions
  • Implementing a Region-Wide Transportation Demand Management Program
  • Reconsidering and Testing New Funding Sources
  • Building Confidence to Collaborate and Move Forward

Click here to read the full article for detailed analysis, data and maps*

*To view the report in the correct layout, make sure to change your reader setting to a two-page view

State Budget Moves Through the General AssemblyState Budget Moves Through the General AssemblyJuly 9, 2021
EDA Releases New Funding OpportunityJuly 30, 2021EDA Releases New Funding Opportunity

Related Posts

Federal funds are commonly passed through state agencies in North Carolina before being awarded to local governments, which can make the original funding source less obvious. Before proceeding with a procurement, local governments should verify whether an award originates from a federal source. This determination affects compliance obligations, including procurement standards, reporting, and audit requirements.

When a construction or repair contract over $300,000 involves a building, the procurement and contract are subject to additional requirements under N.C.G.S. 143-128. Therefore, this question must be answered to determine whether the additional statutory requirements apply to this procurement scenario.

The micro-purchase threshold is a federal procurement threshold under which competitive procurement is not required. The default micro-purchase threshold is $15,000, but local governments may increase the micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000. An explanation of increasing the micro-purchase threshold and a template for the required annual self-certification is available here.